and again again – US lawyer sanctioned after being caught using ChatGPT for court brief | Practice Source – Legal News and Views

The Utah court of appeals has sanctioned a lawyer after he was discovered to have used ChatGPT for a filing he made in which he referenced a nonexistent court case.

Earlier this week, the Utah court of appeals made the decision to sanction Richard Bednar over claims that he filed a brief that included false citations.

According to court documents reviewed by ABC4, Bednar and Douglas Durbano, another Utah-based lawyer who was serving as the petitioner’s counsel, filed a “timely petition for interlocutory appeal”.

Upon reviewing the brief, which was written by a law clerk, the respondent’s counsel found several false citations of cases.

“It appears that at least some portions of the Petition may be AI-generated, including citations and even quotations to at least one case that does not appear to exist in any legal database (and could only be found in ChatGPT and references to cases that are wholly unrelated to the referenced subject matter,” the respondent’s counsel said in documents reviewed by ABC4.

The outlet reported that the brief referenced a case titled “Royer v Nelson”, which did not exist in any legal database.

Read more https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/may/31/utah-lawyer-chatgpt-ai-court-brief