Theory, Solved Example and Demonstration in Agri Analyze

January 21, 2025

6

The blog discuss in details about theory of F test, its use cases, solved example (manually) and a demonstration using online tool Agri Analyze (Reading time 10 min)

Introduction

The F-test is a statistical method used to compare the variances of two samples or the ratio of variances across multiple samples. It assesses whether the data follow an F-distribution under the null hypothesis, assuming standard conditions for the error term (ε). The test statistic, denoted as F, is commonly used to compare fitted models to determine which best represents the underlying population. F-tests are frequently employed in models fitted using least squares. The test is named after Ronald Fisher, who introduced the concept as the “variance ratio” in the 1920s, with George W. Snedecor later naming the test in Fisher’s honor.

Definition

An F-test uses the F-statistic to evaluate whether the variances of two samples (or populations) are equal. The test assumes that the population follows an F-distribution and that the samples are independent. If the F-test yields statistically significant results, the null hypothesis of equal variances is rejected; otherwise, it is not.

Use of F-Test in Statistics

The F-test is a statistical tool used to compare variances and determine if there are significant differences between two populations or samples. It is commonly applied in regression analysis, statistical inference, model fitting, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) to identify the best-fitting statistical model or assess differences across groups.

Regression analysis
Statistical inference
Model fitting
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)

Assumptions

Independence: The observations within each group must be independent, meaning there should be no relationship between observations across samples.
Normality: Data in each group should follow a normal distribution. For large sample sizes, this assumption can be relaxed based on the Central Limit Theorem.
Homogeneity of variances: The variances across groups being compared should be approximately equal.

Important Notes on the F-Test

The F-test is used to assess whether the variances of two populations are equal by comparing them using an F distribution.
The F-test statistic is calculated as $F = \frac{\sigma_1^2}{\sigma_2^2}$
The null hypothesis is evaluated using a critical value, which determines whether to reject the hypothesis.
A common application of the F-test is the one-way ANOVA, which assesses variability between group means and within group observations.

Selection Criteria for σ₁² and σ₂² in an F-Test

For a right-tailed or two-tailed F-test, the variance with the greater value is placed in the numerator, making the sample corresponding to σ₁² the first sample. The smaller variance (σ₂²) is the denominator for the second sample.
For a left-tailed test, the smaller variance is in the numerator (sample 1), while the larger variance is in the denominator (sample 2).

Hypotheses
Left-Tailed Test:

Null Hypothesis (H₀): σ₁² = σ₂²
Alternative Hypothesis (H₁): σ₁²
Decision Criteria: Reject H₀ if the F-statistic

Right-Tailed Test:

Null Hypothesis (H₀): σ₁² = σ₂²
Alternative Hypothesis (H₁): σ₁² > σ₂²
Decision Criteria: Reject H₀ if the F-statistic > F-critical value.

Two-Tailed Test:

Null Hypothesis (H₀): σ₁² = σ₂²
Alternative Hypothesis (H₁): σ₁² ≠ σ₂²

Procedure for Conducting an F-Test:

Define Hypotheses
- Null Hypothesis (H₀): The variances of the groups are equal.
- Alternative Hypothesis (H₁): The variances of the groups are not equal.
Collect Data
Gather sample data from the groups being compared.
Calculate Sample Variances
For each group, compute the sample variance (S²) using the formula:

$S^2 = \frac{\sum (x_i – \bar{x})^2}{n – 1}$

where $x_i$
Calculate F-Statistic
Compute the F-statistic as follows:

$F = \frac{S_1^2}{S_2^2}$

where $S_1^2$ is the larger variance and $S_2^2$
Determine Degrees of Freedom
Calculate degrees of freedom for each group:

$\text{df}_1 = n_1 – 1 \quad \text{(numerator)}$ $\text{df}_2 = n_2 – 1 \quad \text{(denominator)}$
Find the Critical Value
Using an F-distribution table, locate the critical value for your chosen significance level (e.g., $α = 0.05$ ) based on ${df}_{1}$
Make a Decision
- If $F > \text{Critical Value}$ , reject the null hypothesis, indicating significant differences in variances.
- If $F \leq \text{Critical Value}$ , fail to reject the null hypothesis, suggesting no significant variance differences.
Conclusion

Reject the null hypothesis if $F$ exceeds the critical value, indicating significant variance between groups.
Fail to reject the null hypothesis if $F$ is less than or equal to the critical value, implying insufficient evidence for variance differences.

Example: –

Life
expectancy in 9 regions of Brazil in 1900 and 11 regions of Brazil in 1970 was
as given in the table below:

Region	Life expectancy (year)
Region	1900	1970
1	42.7	54.2
2	43.7	50.4
3	34.0	44.2
4	39.2	49.7
5	46.1	55.4
6	48.7	57.0
7	49.4	58.2
8	45.9	56.6
9	55.3	61.9
10		57.5
11		53.4

We aim to determine whether the variation in life expectancy across different regions in 1900 and 1970 is the same. Assuming the populations in 1900 and 1970 follow normal distributions, $N(\mu_1, \sigma_1^2)$ and $N(\mu_2, \sigma_2^2)$ , the hypotheses can be formulated as:

Null Hypothesis $H_0$
Alternative Hypothesis $H_1$

The F-test is applied to evaluate these hypotheses.

Calculate Sample Variances:

$S_1^2 = \frac{1}{8} \left( \sum_{i=1}^9 x_{1i}^2 – \frac{\left( \sum_{i=1}^9 x_{1i} \right)^2}{9} \right)$ $S_1^2 = \frac{1}{8} \left( 18527.78 – \frac{405^2}{9} \right) = \frac{302.78}{8} = 37.848$ $S_2^2 = \frac{1}{10} \left( \sum_{j=1}^{11} x_{2j}^2 – \frac{\left( \sum_{j=1}^{11} x_{2j} \right)^2}{11} \right)$
Calculate the F-Statistic:

$F = \frac{S_1^2}{S_2^2} = \frac{37.848}{23.607} = 1.603$
Conclusion:
The critical values from the F-distribution table at $\alpha = 0.05$ for a two-tailed test with degrees of freedom (8, 10) are $F_{0.025} = 3.85$ and $F_{0.975} = 0.233$ . Since the calculated F-value (1.603) is less than 3.85 and greater than 0.233, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. This indicates that there is no significant difference in the variances of life expectancy between 1900 and 1970 across the regions of Brazil.