Tuesday, 03 December 2024
Author: Stuart Sanders, Benjamin Gray
In September the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Professional Game Match Officials Ltd [2024] UKSC 29 (PGMOL), concerning the employment status of part-time football referees. The issue for the court was whether these referees, who officiate for a fixed fee per game mainly in leagues below the Premier League, should be classified as employees for tax purposes as this would determine the treatment of income for the purposes of income tax and national insurance contributions.
The Court agreed with HMRC that referees could indeed potentially be employees for each specific match engagement. The case has been remitted back to the First-tier Tribunal to reconsider the employment status (or otherwise) of the referees in the light of the Supreme Court’s guidance.
The article analyses the court’s decision and the reasoning adopted. its broader implications, particularly for the sports industry. It considers how the Supreme Court’s ruling, which favoured HMRC’s position that referees could potentially be considered employees for individual matches, might impact other sports organizations that use similar payment structures.
To continue reading or watching login or register here
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
Related Articles
Written by
Stuart Sanders
Stuart joined Littleton Chambers in April 2019 upon completion of a Third Six Pupillage, having previously undertaken 12-month pupillage at a leading commercial set. Stuart accepts instructions across all Chambers’ core areas of work, and has a particular interest in commercial and business protection work.
Benjamin Gray
Benjamin Gray is a barrister at Littleton Chambers. He is an experienced specialist in employment and commercial law cases and appears regularly across a range of courts and tribunals both at first instance and on appeal.
